Skip to content

Conversation

fluiderson
Copy link
Contributor

This change restores the previous behavior prior to #117925. That PR was made to handle OOM errors that turn into a panic with Vec::with_capacity. try_reserve_exact was used for that since there was no try_with_capacity method at the time. It was added later in #120504. I think it'd a better fit here.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 18, 2025

r? @thomcc

rustbot has assigned @thomcc.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 18, 2025
@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented May 19, 2025

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 19, 2025

📌 Commit 0dec3fe has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 19, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 20, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 0dec3fe with merge 22dca7e...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
Replace `try_reserve_exact` with `try_with_capacity` in `std::fs::read`

This change restores the previous behavior prior to rust-lang#117925. That PR was made to handle OOM errors that turn into a panic with `Vec::with_capacity`. `try_reserve_exact` was used for that since there was no `try_with_capacity` method at the time. It was added later in rust-lang#120504. I think it'd a better fit here.
@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

@bors retry (bumping in favour of rollup that includes this PR)

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#141211 (Replace `try_reserve_exact` with `try_with_capacity` in `std::fs::read`)
 - rust-lang#141257 (trim cache module in utils bootstrap)
 - rust-lang#141259 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#141261 (current_dll_path: fix mistake in assertion message)
 - rust-lang#141262 (Properly remove Noratrieb from review rotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 66388d9 into rust-lang:master May 20, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone May 20, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 20, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 0dec3fe with merge a8e4c68...

rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#141211 - fluiderson:dev, r=thomcc

Replace `try_reserve_exact` with `try_with_capacity` in `std::fs::read`

This change restores the previous behavior prior to rust-lang#117925. That PR was made to handle OOM errors that turn into a panic with `Vec::with_capacity`. `try_reserve_exact` was used for that since there was no `try_with_capacity` method at the time. It was added later in rust-lang#120504. I think it'd a better fit here.
@fluiderson fluiderson deleted the dev branch May 20, 2025 09:45
github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
Replace `try_reserve_exact` with `try_with_capacity` in `std::fs::read`

This change restores the previous behavior prior to rust-lang#117925. That PR was made to handle OOM errors that turn into a panic with `Vec::with_capacity`. `try_reserve_exact` was used for that since there was no `try_with_capacity` method at the time. It was added later in rust-lang#120504. I think it'd a better fit here.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants